Question: What do the numbers in column 30 in the 1910 census mean? I have many relatives with different numbers in this column
Answer: Column 30 specifies whether the person owns (O) or rents (R) a home. But I suspect that you are referring to numbers such as the ones written in on the right hand side. They look as if they are written in a different handwriting than the census itself and they don’t appear in every column.
A little research led me to Census Tick Marks and Codes – Revisited Yet Again! by Elizabeth Shown Mills where she discusses similar numbers on the 1900 census. Some analysis led her to the number there, so let’s try it here.
Given that the codes do not appear on lines with no occupations, I hypothesize that they are occupation codes. We can create a chart to compare them easily.
You’ll notice that both Cooks have the code: 14-0-7-X and that the last three nurses are 1-5-6-X. However, the first nurse is 9-5-6-X. Am I wrong or did someone write this down wrong?
If you check other pages and the same occupation/industry pair you see the same codes.
Now this doesn’t add anything new to your knowledge of your ancestor, but it does give you a place to start if you can’t read the handwriting. Look for the same code, and maybe you can decipher the occupation that way. And nice job of looking at the columns on the census and every little detail!
While we’re looking at details, you may have also noticed that we have indexed a few more columns on the 1940 census, including marital status, street, occupation, industry, whether the house was owned or rented, and highest grade completed.
If I enter “Lexington, Rockbridge, Virginia” for Lived In and “Houston Street” for Street and mark both exact, I can see everyone who lived on the same street as my great grandparents in 1940. This can help you locate other relatives and who lived around them.
I know my grandfather was a rug weaver in a carpet mill in 1940. If I put in the exact location and “Weaver” and mark it exact, I get a list of everyone in that town who was a Weaver. I suspect these are the people he worked with and knew.
The details are always important!
— Ancestry Anne
- Kathleen Gregory answered:thank you, Anne! I need to try check this out!
- Mary L. Buck answered:Never mind. Lots of people caught this homophonic error.
- Mary L. Buck answered:Please take a look at the third sentence of the first paragraph.
- Wilma Wildcat answered:…with the 7 and 6 — and 6 and 6 — possibly referring to different specialties.
- Wilma Wildcat answered:I think the second line, where you have “??” is also “phycisian” and then the “5” in the column above it might be understood as repeated…
- danyea likes this
- ancestry-stickynotes posted this